Monday, May 17, 2010

Rc Helicopters Parts In Mumbai

I like Dexter, but ...



[Clarification: I'm in the middle of the second season, so it is very likely that within a few days, all I'm going to say next is refuted by myself. It may be early to make judgments about the series without having seen even half, or maybe not. Say this is a critical in construction, and as such will be reviewed and modified as progress in my viewing. It's the magic of television.]

Perhaps
is a perception problem for me, but I think people take too seriously Dexter. And frankly, I do not seem so bad. In the same way that a professor from my roommate commented that Lost is a series made for people to feel more intelligent than he is, I think Dexter is a series made for the viewer to think you are an exercise of reflection on various aspects of human nature, when in fact they are being led, with little or ambiguous implications, however much it may seem. Because Dexter not Six Feet Under, but rather a series that would fit perfectly into the programming of the networks if properly cut, wait, I think that has already happened.

Dexter's monologues make things easier, like the series in general. Work perfectly to provide the tone and are a stylistic well spent. But otherwise, they are much more introspective than those of Meredith Grey. As I said, Dexter eloquently expresses everything you feel, and serves on a platter the interpretation that we do what happens in his head. We have a free hand to enter and see everything there. This is not necessarily a problem. That is, there is nothing wrong with the articulation of thoughts and emotions long abstract get it done right, and I think Dexter does it well, "but I do not like to think for myself. When a character takes you by the hand through its transformation, the ambiguities and complexities are exposed so clearly to cease to be. With Dexter feel that there is nothing beyond what you see or what they say. And that, to me it is an insurmountable problem.

is not reduced only to the monologues. All actions of the characters I indicate a high level of manipulation to the viewer. All evolve through very basic narrative strategies, and often clumsy. Debra and post-trauma Ice Truck Killer is the best example. Subtlety conspicuously absent. But this happens with every character in this second season, I'm envisioning that there is not one that I find interesting or liking me, are all fairly two-dimensional. As in the world of Queer as Folk , everyone is gay, in the case of Dexter , almost all are for someone to take the law into their own hands and finish with the criminals - that is, they all are in favor of the death penalty, speaking clearly. Okay, you may be exaggerating. It is just a basic strategy to enter the conflict in the season, as it summarizes the back of the DVD, "Am I a good person doing bad things or bad person doing good things? "- and in this sense, I'm happy because a show like Dexter without that conflict would be simply unacceptable. In short, I can not ask more of a story that appears to be highly fictional. And this respect, recourse may, for one, enjoy Dexter as it seems, a story, a grim story for children, with a protagonist constantly tested to meet morals about yourself and the human being . But are these morals morally acceptable? For now, I have my doubts. But time will tell (please, no spoilers ).

Dexter fortunately shines in other respects. Having accepted that all this can be a personal problem and probably the series does not expect more than what it seems, the more I convince myself, if I want to see her, "I will continue to enjoy the light entertainment it offers me. Because above all, Dexter not bore me, thanks to the excellent handling of the ongoing tension and plot twists, always well resolved. So for now, I will not ask more. At last, after all, is Showtime.


And now, an aside: Can a single woman loaded a series and to induce the viewer to kill, kill, kill? Sorry for the photo. I know it may offend the sensibilities.


0 comments:

Post a Comment